top of page

Why Attachment Matters and How Different Styles Shape Our Future

A wooden man walking up stairs which aims to show why attachment matters and how it can shape future growth.

This site contains product affiliate links. We may receive a small commission if you make a purchase after clicking on one of these links.


Our early relationships with caregivers shape the blueprint for how we relate to ourselves and others throughout life. According to attachment theory, first developed by John Bowlby and later expanded by Mary Ainsworth, the quality of these early bonds lays the foundation for an individual's emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships and sense of self-worth.


‘We’re only as needy as out unmet needs”

These patterns, known as attachment styles, can have both positive and negative impacts on a person’s future development, depending on the nature of the attachment formed. For example, studies conducted in the early 90s revealed a strong association ‘between unresolved parental attachment status and infant D [disorganised] attachment’ (Healing Trauma). Children who form a disorganised attachment will likely struggle with interpersonal relationships later in life.


In contrast, the converse outcome is consistent among children who form secure attachments with parents and caregivers. Such children are far more likely to establish secure relationships in adulthood and possess greater psychological flexibility.


In this article, we explore the four main attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganised) and how each can influence developmental outcomes across the lifespan.


1. Secure attachment

A secure attachment style is widely recognised as a cornerstone of healthy psychological development. It typically emerges when a caregiver is consistently responsive, emotionally attuned and reliably available during early childhood.


In such environments, the child quickly learns that others can be trusted to provide safety and emotional support. Through the regular meeting of their needs, the child develops a robust internal working model characterised by trust, self-worth and emotional regulation.


One significant benefit of establishing a secure attachment in early life is a lower risk of experiencing mental health difficulties in adulthood. While many factors contribute to this link, a prevailing explanation is that securely attached children are more likely to have grown up in stable, nurturing households and thus have encountered fewer traumatic experiences (also know as adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)).


By contrast, children exposed to frequent trauma – such as abuse, neglect, or inconsistent caregiving – often show elevated levels of stress hormones. Neurobiological research outlined in Robert M. Sapolsky's book, Behave, indicates that such chronic stress in childhood can impair the development of the prefrontal cortex, a brain region vital for executive functioning, emotional regulation, and decision-making. These impairments may have far-reaching effects on cognitive and emotional wellbeing throughout life.


Positive impacts

  • Emotional regulation: Securely attached individuals tend to have greater capacity for recognising and managing their emotions.

  • Resilience: They are more adaptable in the face of stress and better equipped to cope with life’s challenges (Sroufe et al., 2005).

  • Healthy relationships: Secure adults are typically comfortable with intimacy and autonomy. They can form close, trusting relationships and maintain appropriate boundaries.

  • Positive self-concept: A secure base in childhood promotes higher self-esteem and confidence in one’s abilities.


Potential challenges

While secure attachment offers many advantages, it’s not a guarantee of immunity from life difficulties. Individuals may still experience trauma, loss, or setbacks – but their secure attachment style typically provides the resources to navigate these with greater stability.


2. Anxious attachment

Anxious (or preoccupied) attachment is marked by a strong need for closeness, often accompanied by a deep fear of abandonment. Analogous to a sparkler, people with this attachment style may form intense relationships that start quickly but become difficult to maintain and shortly fizzle out. Their constant need for reassurance can put pressure on the other person, leading to conflict or emotional withdrawal that reinforces their fears.


This pattern often begins in early childhood, especially when a caregiver is emotionally inconsistent – sometimes warm and attentive, but at other times distant, distracted, or overly involved. As a result, the child learns that love and comfort are unpredictable. Over time, this uncertainty can create a deep-seated worry about being rejected or not being ‘enough’ to keep someone close.


Attachment theory pioneers, most notably Bowlby and Ainsworth, explain how early experiences with caregivers shape our expectations and behaviours in relationships. In the case of anxious attachment, these early inconsistencies lay the groundwork for future struggles with trust, self-worth and emotional regulation.


Negative impacts

  • Emotional dysregulation: Adults with anxious attachment may struggle with intense emotions, especially fear, jealousy and insecurity.

  • Relationship difficulties: There may be a tendency to become overly dependent on partners, seek constant validation, or misinterpret signals of abandonment.

  • Self-worth issues: A deep-seated fear of not being “enough” can lead to people-pleasing, perfectionism, or anxiety in social situations.


Growth opportunities

Although anxious attachment can lead to distress, many individuals develop high emotional intelligence due to their heightened attunement to others. With therapeutic support, they can learn to soothe their anxieties, build self-trust and form healthier relationships (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007).


3. Avoidant attachment

Avoidant (or dismissive) attachment often develops when caregivers are emotionally distant, rejecting, or discourage emotional expression. In this environment, a child quickly learns that showing vulnerability or seeking comfort is unlikely to be met with warmth or support. Instead, they adapt by turning inward – suppressing their emotional needs and becoming self-reliant as a way of protecting themselves from further disappointment.


As these children grow, they may carry this pattern into adulthood, appearing independent and self-sufficient while keeping others at arm’s length. Intimacy can feel uncomfortable or even threatening, as relying on others clashes with their early experience of needing to manage alone.


According to attachment theory, our early interactions with caregivers shape the way we relate to others throughout life. In the case of avoidant attachment, emotional self-sufficiency becomes a defence against the pain of unmet needs and emotional disconnection.


Negative impacts

  • Emotional suppression: Avoidantly attached individuals may disconnect from their emotions or minimise their importance.

  • Fear of intimacy: They often keep others at arm’s length, struggle with vulnerability and may avoid commitment.

  • Low relational satisfaction: Relationships may lack emotional depth or closeness, potentially leading to isolation or misunderstanding.


Positive traits

Some avoidant individuals develop a strong sense of independence and self-reliance, which can be beneficial in professional or high-stress environments. When coupled with greater emotional awareness, this can evolve into a more balanced relational style.


4. Disorganised attachment

Disorganised (or fearful-avoidant) attachment often develops in early environments where the caregiver is both a source of comfort and a source of fear – such as in situations involving trauma, abuse, or neglect. ‘Fear of the parent [...] is anticipated to lead to disorganized attachment’ (Healing Trauma). This creates a deep internal conflict for the child: they instinctively seek safety from the very person who is also causing distress.


As a result, the child struggles to form a clear or consistent strategy for connection. Their attachment behaviour may appear confused, erratic, or contradictory seeking closeness one moment and withdrawing the next. Over time, this can lead to difficulties in trusting others, managing emotions and feeling safe in relationships.


Attachment theorists suggests that when early relationships are frightening or chaotic, the developing brain may not build a coherent template for how to engage with others. Instead, disorganised attachment often leads to feelings of shame, fear of intimacy and uncertainty about whether others can be trusted or relied upon.


Negative impacts

  • Severe emotional dysregulation: Individuals may swing between emotional extremes, from clinging to withdrawal, with difficulty understanding or trusting others.

  • High vulnerability to mental health issues: Disorganised attachment is strongly associated with complex trauma, anxiety, depression and dissociation (Lyons-Ruth & Jacobvitz, 2008).

  • Self-sabotage and inner conflict: A desire for closeness may be overwhelmed by fear of betrayal or harm, resulting in chaotic relationships and low self-worth.


Pathways to healing

Disorganised attachment can be deeply painful, but not irreversible. With trauma-informed therapy, particularly somatic or relational approaches, individuals can build internal coherence, establish a secure base in therapy, and begin to rewrite their relational templates.


Attachment styles and lifelong development

Attachment styles don’t just influence childhood – they reverberate throughout life. They impact how we navigate:


  • Friendships and romantic relationships

  • Parenting styles and intergenerational patterns

  • Workplace dynamics and leadership

  • Mental health and resilience to stress


Crucially, attachment styles are adaptable. Life experiences, supportive relationships and psychotherapy can all foster greater security, even for those who began life with insecure attachments. The concept of earned secure attachment reflects this capacity for growth and transformation (Roisman et al., 2002).



Conclusion

Attachment styles profoundly shape our emotional lives and developmental trajectory. While secure attachment offers a strong foundation for mental health and relational success, insecure styles – anxious, avoidant, or disorganised – can pose significant challenges.


However, these patterns are not fixed destinies. With awareness, support and often therapeutic intervention, individuals can develop more secure ways of relating to themselves and others.


Understanding your attachment style is not about assigning blame or labels, but about gaining insight. Whether your early experiences were nurturing or fraught with difficulty, there is always potential for healing, growth and secure connection.



References

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. Guildford Press.

Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. Guildford Press.

Lyons-Ruth, K., & Jacobvitz, D. (2008). Attachment disorganisation: Genetic factors, parenting contexts, and developmental transformation.

Roisman, G. I., Padrón, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect.



About Dr Laura Allen –

A Chartered Psychologist & Integrative Therapist, Dr Allen specialises in a broad range of therapeutic methods. She is a published author of numerous research papers and Interactive Courses in the field of Psychology. Dr Allen works one-to-one with clients and supervises other practitioners. She is also a proud member of the British Psychological Society assessment team supporting psychologists in training.

Comments


bottom of page